2002 Ford Econovan vs. 1964 Riley 4

To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Riley 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Riley 4 would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Econovan (90 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1964 Riley 4. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1964 Riley 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econovan weights approximately 143 kg more than 1964 Riley 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Econovan (138 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Riley 4. (121 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Econovan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Riley 4.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Ford Econovan 1964 Riley 4
Make Ford Riley
Model Econovan 4
Year Released 2002 1964
Body Type Van Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1789 cc 1622 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 90 HP 67 HP
Torque 138 Nm 121 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1295 kg 1152 kg
Vehicle Length 4290 mm 4540 mm
Vehicle Width 1640 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1870 mm 1530 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2530 mm