2002 Ford Econovan vs. 1976 Lamborghini Urraco

To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Lamborghini Urraco. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Lamborghini Urraco would be higher. At 2,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Lamborghini Urraco is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Lamborghini Urraco (260 HP) has 170 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econovan. (90 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Lamborghini Urraco should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Lamborghini Urraco weights approximately 5 kg more than 2002 Ford Econovan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Lamborghini Urraco (273 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econovan. (138 Nm). This means 1976 Lamborghini Urraco will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econovan.

Compare all specifications: