2002 Ford Econovan vs. 1977 Renault 20
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Renault 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Renault 20 would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Renault 20 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econovan weights approximately 15 kg more than 1977 Renault 20.
Because 2002 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Renault 20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1977 Renault 20 has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford Econovan has manual transmission. 2002 Ford Econovan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1977 Renault 20 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econovan | 1977 Renault 20 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Econovan | 20 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2670 mm |