2002 Ford Econovan vs. 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 911 kg more than 2002 Ford Econovan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford Econovan has manual transmission. 2002 Ford Econovan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Econovan | 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Econovan | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1789 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 2206 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3050 mm |
