2002 Ford Econovan vs. 1981 Toyota Starlet
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Starlet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Starlet would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econovan weights approximately 600 kg more than 1981 Toyota Starlet.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econovan | 1981 Toyota Starlet | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Econovan | Starlet |
Year Released | 2002 | 1981 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2310 mm |