2002 Ford Econovan vs. 1983 GMC Jimmy
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 GMC Jimmy. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 GMC Jimmy would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 GMC Jimmy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Econovan (90 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1983 GMC Jimmy. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1983 GMC Jimmy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 GMC Jimmy weights approximately 100 kg more than 2002 Ford Econovan.
Because 1983 GMC Jimmy is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Econovan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 GMC Jimmy will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 GMC Jimmy (147 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econovan. (138 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1983 GMC Jimmy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econovan | 1983 GMC Jimmy | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | Econovan | Jimmy |
Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 138 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2560 mm |