2002 Ford Econovan vs. 1985 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Plymouth Sundance (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Sundance should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econovan weights approximately 120 kg more than 1985 Plymouth Sundance.
Because 2002 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econovan | 1985 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Ford | Plymouth |
Model | Econovan | Sundance |
Year Released | 2002 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2470 mm |