2002 Ford Econovan vs. 1989 Acura Integra
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Acura Integra would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Acura Integra (113 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econovan. (90 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econovan.
Because 2002 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1989 Acura Integra has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford Econovan has manual transmission. 2002 Ford Econovan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Acura Integra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econovan | 1989 Acura Integra | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Econovan | Integra |
Year Released | 2002 | 1989 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 113 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4355 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1665 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2520 mm |