2002 Ford Econovan vs. 1991 Ford Sierra
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Sierra would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Econovan (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1991 Ford Sierra. (75 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econovan weights approximately 150 kg more than 1991 Ford Sierra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Ford Sierra (152 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econovan. (138 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1991 Ford Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econovan | 1991 Ford Sierra | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Econovan | Sierra |
Year Released | 2002 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1751 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2620 mm |