2002 Ford Econovan vs. 1993 Volvo 960
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Volvo 960 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Volvo 960 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Volvo 960 (187 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Volvo 960 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Volvo 960 weights approximately 235 kg more than 2002 Ford Econovan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econovan | 1993 Volvo 960 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Econovan | 960 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2780 mm |