2002 Ford Econovan vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Econovan | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Econovan | FTO |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2510 mm |
