2002 Ford Econovan vs. 1997 Lamborghini Diablo
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Lamborghini Diablo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Lamborghini Diablo would be higher. At 5,706 cc (12 cylinders), 1997 Lamborghini Diablo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Lamborghini Diablo (530 HP) has 440 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econovan. (90 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Lamborghini Diablo should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econovan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Lamborghini Diablo (603 Nm) has 465 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econovan. (138 Nm). This means 1997 Lamborghini Diablo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Econovan | 1997 Lamborghini Diablo | |
| Make | Ford | Lamborghini |
| Model | Econovan | Diablo |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1789 cc | 5706 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 530 HP |
| Torque | 138 Nm | 603 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2650 mm |
