2002 Ford Econovan vs. 1998 Fiat Siena
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Fiat Siena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Fiat Siena would be higher. At 1,910 cc, 1998 Fiat Siena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Econovan (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1998 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1998 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Fiat Siena weights approximately 5 kg more than 2002 Ford Econovan.
Because 2002 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Fiat Siena (200 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econovan. (138 Nm). This means 1998 Fiat Siena will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Econovan | 1998 Fiat Siena | |
| Make | Ford | Fiat |
| Model | Econovan | Siena |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Van | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1910 cc |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 138 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1300 kg |
