2002 Ford Econovan vs. 2003 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2003 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econovan would be higher. At 4,662 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota 4Runner (232 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 665 kg more than 2002 Ford Econovan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Econovan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econovan. (138 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econovan. 2003 Toyota 4Runner has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford Econovan has manual transmission. 2002 Ford Econovan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Toyota 4Runner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econovan | 2003 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Econovan | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 4662 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 434 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2800 mm |