2002 Ford Econovan vs. 2010 Jeep Patriot

To start off, 2010 Jeep Patriot is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econovan would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Patriot is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Patriot (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Patriot should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econovan.

Because 2002 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Patriot, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Patriot (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econovan. (138 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Patriot will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econovan.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Ford Econovan 2010 Jeep Patriot
Make Ford Jeep
Model Econovan Patriot
Year Released 2002 2010
Body Type Van SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1789 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 90 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 138 Nm 191 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 5000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4290 mm 4409 mm
Vehicle Width 1640 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1870 mm 1669 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2634 mm