2002 Ford Econovan vs. 2011 Audi Q5
To start off, 2011 Audi Q5 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econovan would be higher. At 1,964 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Audi Q5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi Q5 (138 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi Q5 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econovan.
Because 2011 Audi Q5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Econovan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi Q5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi Q5 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econovan. (138 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Audi Q5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econovan | 2011 Audi Q5 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Econovan | Q5 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1654 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2807 mm |