2002 Ford Econovan vs. 2011 Koenigsegg Agera
To start off, 2011 Koenigsegg Agera is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econovan would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Koenigsegg Agera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Koenigsegg Agera (1,100 HP) has 1010 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econovan. (90 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Koenigsegg Agera should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econovan weights approximately 5 kg more than 2011 Koenigsegg Agera.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econovan | 2011 Koenigsegg Agera | |
Make | Ford | Koenigsegg |
Model | Econovan | Agera |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 1100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Biofuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2660 mm |