2002 Ford Econovan vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econovan would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Econovan (90 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Because 2002 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Econovan (138 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Econovan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econovan | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Econovan | Micra |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 138 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2449 mm |