2002 Ford Econovan vs. 2013 Honda Accord
To start off, 2013 Honda Accord is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econovan would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Honda Accord is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda Accord (274 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Honda Accord weights approximately 320 kg more than 2002 Ford Econovan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Honda Accord (342 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econovan. (138 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Honda Accord will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econovan. 2013 Honda Accord has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford Econovan has manual transmission. 2002 Ford Econovan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Honda Accord will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econovan | 2013 Honda Accord | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Econovan | Accord |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 3471 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 274 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 342 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4862 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1465 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2775 mm |