2002 Ford Escape vs. 1951 Hudson Hornet
To start off, 2002 Ford Escape is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Hudson Hornet (143 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2002 Ford Escape. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Hudson Hornet should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Escape. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 330 kg more than 2002 Ford Escape. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Ford Escape is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Hudson Hornet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Escape will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Escape | 1951 Hudson Hornet | |
| Make | Ford | Hudson |
| Model | Escape | Hornet |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1988 cc | 4810 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2990 mm |
