2002 Ford Explorer vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Ford Explorer is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Explorer (210 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Explorer weights approximately 744 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Explorer (321 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Explorer | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Explorer | 2000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 321 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 95 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1939 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2700 mm |