2002 Ford Explorer vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Explorer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Explorer would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2002 Ford Explorer. (210 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Explorer.
Because 2002 Ford Explorer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Explorer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Explorer (321 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Explorer | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Explorer | Commodore |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 321 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |