2002 Ford F-150 vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore
To start off, 2002 Ford F-150 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford F-150 (202 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford F-150 weights approximately 419 kg more than 1949 Hudson Commodore. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Hudson Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford F-150 | 1949 Hudson Commodore | |
| Make | Ford | Hudson |
| Model | F-150 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1656 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3160 mm |
