2002 Ford F-150 vs. 1994 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2002 Ford F-150 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2002 Ford F-150. (202 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford F-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford F-150 weights approximately 775 kg more than 1994 Mazda RX-7.
Because 2002 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford F-150 (339 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda RX-7. (296 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2002 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford F-150 | 1994 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | F-150 | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 296 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2440 mm |