2002 Ford F-150 vs. 1995 Rover MGF
To start off, 2002 Ford F-150 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover MGF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover MGF would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford F-150 (202 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1995 Rover MGF. (145 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover MGF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford F-150 weights approximately 551 kg more than 1995 Rover MGF. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Rover MGF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford F-150 (339 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover MGF. (236 Nm). This means 2002 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover MGF.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford F-150 | 1995 Rover MGF | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | F-150 | MGF |
Year Released | 2002 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 236 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1280 mm |