2002 Ford F-150 vs. 1996 Lancia Kappa
To start off, 2002 Ford F-150 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lancia Kappa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lancia Kappa would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 202 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford F-150 weights approximately 525 kg more than 1996 Lancia Kappa.
Because 2002 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Lancia Kappa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford F-150 (339 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lancia Kappa. (299 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2002 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lancia Kappa.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford F-150 | 1996 Lancia Kappa | |
Make | Ford | Lancia |
Model | F-150 | Kappa |
Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 299 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2710 mm |