2002 Ford F-150 vs. 2006 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2002 Ford F-150. (202 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford F-150.
Because 2002 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda CX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford F-150. (339 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford F-150. 2006 Mazda CX-7 has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford F-150 has manual transmission. 2002 Ford F-150 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda CX-7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford F-150 | 2006 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | F-150 | CX-7 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2298 cc |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 244 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |