2002 Ford F-150 vs. 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet
To start off, 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2002 Ford F-150. (202 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford F-150.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford F-150 (339 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet. (336 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2002 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford F-150 | 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | F-150 | Murano CrossCabriolet |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 336 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4829 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1681 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2824 mm |