2002 Ford F-250 vs. 1973 Mazda 616
To start off, 2002 Ford F-250 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford F-250 (256 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1973 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford F-250 weights approximately 1440 kg more than 1973 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford F-250 (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford F-250 | 1973 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | F-250 | 616 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1973 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 474 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2350 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 2480 mm |