2002 Ford F-250 vs. 1998 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2002 Ford F-250 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jaguar XK (445 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 2002 Ford F-250. (256 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford F-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford F-250 weights approximately 785 kg more than 1998 Jaguar XK.
Because 2002 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Jaguar XK (615 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford F-250. (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1998 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford F-250.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford F-250 | 1998 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | F-250 | XK |
Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 3996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 445 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 474 Nm | 615 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2350 kg | 1565 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1140 mm |