2002 Ford F-250 vs. 1999 Holden Maloo
To start off, 2002 Ford F-250 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Holden Maloo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Holden Maloo would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Holden Maloo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford F-250. (474 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford F-250. 2002 Ford F-250 has automatic transmission and 1999 Holden Maloo has manual transmission. 1999 Holden Maloo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Ford F-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford F-250 | 1999 Holden Maloo | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | F-250 | Maloo |
Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 5699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 474 Nm | 542 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |