2002 Ford F-250 vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2002 Ford F-250 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford F-250 (256 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford F-250 weights approximately 980 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Lancia Nea. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford F-250 (474 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2002 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford F-250 | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
Make | Ford | Lancia |
Model | F-250 | Nea |
Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 2445 cc |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 474 Nm | 314 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2350 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 2590 mm |