2002 Ford F-250 vs. 2009 Jaguar XF

To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (410 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 2002 Ford F-250. (256 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford F-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford F-250 weights approximately 508 kg more than 2009 Jaguar XF.

Because 2002 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XF (560 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford F-250. (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford F-250.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Ford F-250 2009 Jaguar XF
Make Ford Jaguar
Model F-250 XF
Year Released 2002 2009
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5407 cc 4196 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 256 HP 410 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 474 Nm 560 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 2350 kg 1842 kg
Vehicle Length 5760 mm 4970 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1470 mm
Vehicle Height 1940 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 3490 mm 2920 mm