2002 Ford F-250 vs. 2011 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 2011 Toyota Sienna is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Sienna (266 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2002 Ford F-250. (256 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Sienna should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford F-250.
Because 2002 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Toyota Sienna. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford F-250 (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Toyota Sienna. (332 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2002 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Toyota Sienna.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford F-250 | 2011 Toyota Sienna | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | F-250 | Sienna |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 474 Nm | 332 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1796 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 3030 mm |