2002 Ford F-250 vs. 2012 Subaru Tribeca
To start off, 2012 Subaru Tribeca is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 256 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford F-250 weights approximately 439 kg more than 2012 Subaru Tribeca.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford F-250 (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Subaru Tribeca. (335 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2002 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Subaru Tribeca.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford F-250 | 2012 Subaru Tribeca | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | F-250 | Tribeca |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5407 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 474 Nm | 335 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2350 kg | 1911 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5760 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1687 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 2748 mm |