2002 Ford F-250 vs. 2013 Chrysler 200

To start off, 2013 Chrysler 200 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chrysler 200 (279 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2002 Ford F-250. (256 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chrysler 200 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford F-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford F-250 weights approximately 728 kg more than 2013 Chrysler 200.

Because 2002 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Chrysler 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford F-250 (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chrysler 200. (353 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2002 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chrysler 200.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Ford F-250 2013 Chrysler 200
Make Ford Chrysler
Model F-250 200
Year Released 2002 2013
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5407 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 256 HP 279 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 474 Nm 353 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 2350 kg 1622 kg
Vehicle Length 5760 mm 4870 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 2121 mm
Vehicle Height 1940 mm 1482 mm
Wheelbase Size 3490 mm 2765 mm