2002 Ford Falcon vs. 1976 Mazda 616
To start off, 2002 Ford Falcon is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Falcon (221 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Falcon weights approximately 605 kg more than 1976 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3150 RPM) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Falcon | 1976 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Falcon | 616 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1976 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 221 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 357 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3150 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92.3 mm | 78.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 83 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2480 mm |
