2002 Ford Falcon vs. 1985 Nissan AZ-1
To start off, 2002 Ford Falcon is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Nissan AZ-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Nissan AZ-1 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Falcon (221 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1985 Nissan AZ-1. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1985 Nissan AZ-1.
Because 1985 Nissan AZ-1 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Nissan AZ-1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Falcon (357 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Nissan AZ-1. (277 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Nissan AZ-1.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Falcon | 1985 Nissan AZ-1 | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Falcon | AZ-1 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1985 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 2950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 357 Nm | 277 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2440 mm |