2002 Ford Falcon vs. 1992 Rover 400
To start off, 2002 Ford Falcon is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 400 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Falcon (221 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1992 Rover 400. (86 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Falcon weights approximately 339 kg more than 1992 Rover 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3150 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 400. (180 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Falcon | 1992 Rover 400 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Falcon | 400 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 357 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3150 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.3 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 22.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1176 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2560 mm |