2002 Ford Falcon vs. 2005 Volvo V50

To start off, 2005 Volvo V50 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Falcon (221 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2005 Volvo V50. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2005 Volvo V50.

Because 2002 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3150 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volvo V50. (245 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volvo V50.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Ford Falcon 2005 Volvo V50
Make Ford Volvo
Model Falcon V50
Year Released 2002 2005
Body Type Sedan Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3984 cc 1560 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 221 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 4900 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 357 Nm 245 Nm
Torque RPM 3150 RPM 1750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1460 mm