2002 Ford Falcon vs. 2013 Mazda CX-09
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-09 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-09 (269 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2002 Ford Falcon. (221 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-09 weights approximately 547 kg more than 2002 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-09 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Falcon. (357 Nm @ 3150 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda CX-09 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Falcon. 2013 Mazda CX-09 has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford Falcon has manual transmission. 2002 Ford Falcon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Mazda CX-09 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Falcon | 2013 Mazda CX-09 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Falcon | CX-09 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 357 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3150 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.3 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 2062 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1728 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 76 L |