2002 Ford Fiesta vs. 1951 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 2002 Ford Fiesta is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Fiesta weights approximately 10 kg more than 1951 Jeep CJ3A.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Fiesta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Fiesta. (99 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1951 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Fiesta.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Fiesta | 1951 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Fiesta | CJ3A |
Year Released | 2002 | 1951 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 99 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2040 mm |