2002 Ford Fiesta vs. 1980 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 2002 Ford Fiesta is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena (140 HP) has 73 more horse power than 2002 Ford Fiesta. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Fiesta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Fiesta weights approximately 71 kg more than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena.
Because 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Fiesta | 1980 Matra-Simca Murena | |
Make | Ford | Matra-Simca |
Model | Fiesta | Murena |
Year Released | 2002 | 1980 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2156 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 140 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 91.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 81.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 1051 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2440 mm |