2002 Ford Focus vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2002 Ford Focus is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Focus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Focus (131 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Focus should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Focus weights approximately 452 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Focus (170 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Focus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Focus | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Focus | Herald |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.8 mm | 69.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1232 kg | 780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 29 L |
