2002 Ford Focus vs. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2002 Ford Focus is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2002 Ford Focus. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Focus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 140 kg more than 2002 Ford Focus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Focus (330 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Focus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Focus | 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Focus | Sigma |
Year Released | 2002 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 176 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2730 mm |