2002 Ford Focus vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Focus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Focus would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Focus (170 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 3. (148 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Focus should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 3 (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Focus. (197 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Focus.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Focus | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Focus | 3 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1988 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 55 L |