2002 Ford Focus vs. 2013 Audi A5
To start off, 2013 Audi A5 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Focus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Focus would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Focus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Audi A5 (208 HP) has 77 more horse power than 2002 Ford Focus. (131 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Audi A5 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Focus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Audi A5 weights approximately 397 kg more than 2002 Ford Focus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Audi A5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Audi A5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Audi A5 (350 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Focus. (170 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2013 Audi A5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Focus.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Focus | 2013 Audi A5 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Focus | A5 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | rear |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 208 HP |
Torque | 170 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.8 mm | 82.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 92.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1232 kg | 1629 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4626 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.2 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |