2002 Ford Fusion vs. 1979 Volvo 164
To start off, 2002 Ford Fusion is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Volvo 164 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2002 Ford Fusion. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Fusion.
Because 1979 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Volvo 164 (205 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Fusion. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1979 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Fusion.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Fusion | 1979 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Fusion | 164 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1979 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3350 mm |