2002 Ford GT 40 vs. 1950 Ford Consul
To start off, 2002 Ford GT 40 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Ford Consul. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Ford Consul would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford GT 40 (350 HP) has 310 more horse power than 1950 Ford Consul. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1950 Ford Consul. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 475 kg more than 1950 Ford Consul. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Ford Consul (100 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1950 Ford Consul will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford GT 40 | 1950 Ford Consul | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | GT 40 | Consul |
Year Released | 2002 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1506 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 40 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 100 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2550 mm |