2002 Ford GT 40 vs. 1950 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2002 Ford GT 40 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1950 Talbot T 26. (276 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1950 Talbot T 26. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 605 kg more than 1950 Talbot T 26. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford GT 40 | 1950 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Ford | Talbot |
| Model | GT 40 | T 26 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1950 |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2510 mm |
